Research · Concept Papers

Enterprise AI Concept Papers

Preprints introducing formally defined frameworks, novel named constructs, and governance models for enterprise AI at scale. By Arjun Jaggi and Aditya Karnam Gururaj Rao.

12
Papers published
39
Coined terms
91
Real citations
← arjunjaggi.com
All Papers · Latest First
ACS-2026-012  ·  August 2026
The Agent Compromise Surface: A Formal Framework for Enterprise AI Agent Security
Agent Compromise Surface Agent Dwell Window Semantic Blast Radius Composite Adversarial Exposure

A compromised enterprise AI agent does not look compromised. Agent Compromise Surface ACS = {I, T, M, O} formally decomposes the four distinct attack vectors. Agent Dwell Window formalizes the temporal gap and establishes why it is structurally longer for agents than for human intruders. Semantic Blast Radius is monotonically non-decreasing with dwell time and reducible only through permission minimization, not detection. Composite Adversarial Exposure aggregates all three into a board-level risk metric. Four-tier Agent Security Maturity Model with concrete organizational criteria. Demonstrates that NIST AI RMF, OWASP LLM Top 10, MITRE ATLAS, and ISO 42001 leave the temporal and spatial dimensions of agent compromise formally undefined.

Arjun Jaggi · Aditya Karnam Gururaj Rao 12 citations EU AI Act Art. 9/11 · NIST AI RMF GOVERN · ISO 42001 · MITRE ATLAS
EAEF-2026-010  ·  August 2026
Enterprise AI Ensembles: A Formal Framework for Multi-Model Routing, Output Arbitration, and Ensemble Governance
Model Ensemble Specification Routing Policy Gap Arbitration Collapse Ensemble Genealogy Incompleteness

Enterprise AI increasingly routes prompts across specialist models and aggregates their outputs, yet no governance standard defines what an auditable ensemble is. Model Ensemble Specification MES = (M, R, A, G) closes this gap. Routing Policy Gap names the structural condition where routing decisions are implicit and unlogged. Arbitration Collapse establishes that ensemble outputs are not attributable to any single model, requiring a six-component Ensemble Genealogy G_ens(o) that extends the Output Genealogy from AOGF-2026-004.

Arjun Jaggi · Aditya Karnam Gururaj Rao 11 citations EU AI Act Art. 10/12 · ISO 42001 cl. 9.1 · NIST AI RMF GOVERN 1.7
AOGF-2026-004  ·  August 2026
Output Genealogy: A Formal Framework for Enterprise AI Audit Provenance
Output Genealogy Provenance Opacity Retroactive Unverifiability Output Genealogy Maturity Model

Regulatory frameworks mandate AI audit trails but none defines what information an audit trail must contain. Output Genealogy G(o) = (M, P, C, D_r, Theta) closes this gap: a 5-tuple capturing every condition necessary to audit an AI output. Provenance Opacity — the structural condition where a deployment cannot reconstruct G(o) — is the default state for most enterprise AI pilots. Retroactive Unverifiability proves reconstruction is architecturally impossible once time-varying components are lost.

Arjun Jaggi · Aditya Karnam Gururaj Rao 9 citations EU AI Act Art. 12 · ISO 42001 cl. 9.1 · NIST AI RMF GOVERN 1.7
Read the paper →
CRF-2026-009  ·  August 2026
The Contribution Ratio Framework: Continuous Authorship Attribution, IEJ Decomposition, and the Provenance Collapse Property for AI-Assisted Work
Contribution Ratio IEJ Decomposition Provenance Collapse Property CR Maturity Model

Binary AI disclosure requirements are structurally insufficient for accountability: any binary function applied to a continuous authorship signal discards the information that governance requires. This paper introduces the Contribution Ratio (CR), a continuous [0,1] metric decomposed across three non-overlapping phases, and proves the Provenance Collapse Property showing why watermark compliance and authorship accountability require separate instruments.

Arjun Jaggi · Aditya Karnam Gururaj Rao 8 citations EU AI Act Art. 50 · Kirchenbauer et al. · NIST AI RMF
Read the paper →
MAGT-2026-008  ·  August 2026
The Governance Topology of Enterprise Multi-Agent Systems
Agent Trust Topology Action Blast Radius Delegation Depth Limit ATT

Enterprise multi-agent deployments introduce a structural governance gap not addressed by any existing standard: the trust topology itself. This paper formalizes the Agent Trust Topology (ATT) as a directed acyclic graph, proves the Acyclicity Requirement as a necessary condition for governable delegation, and introduces Action Blast Radius (ABR) and Delegation Depth Limit (DDL) as the two instruments that bound operational risk in orchestrator-worker architectures.

Arjun Jaggi · Aditya Karnam Gururaj Rao 8 citations Park et al. arXiv:2304.03442 · Guo et al. arXiv:2402.01680 · NIST AI RMF
Read the paper →
AIFG-2026-007  ·  August 2026
The AI Fiduciary Gap: Accountability Vacuum, Outcome Attribution Failure, and a Formal Governance Architecture for Enterprise AI Fiduciary Duty
AI Fiduciary Gap Outcome Attribution Failure Accountability Vacuum Index Attribution Horizon AIFA

Enterprise AI deployments have crossed a material accountability threshold: organizations are making consequential decisions through AI systems for which no identified principal bears legally or operationally defined accountability. This paper formalizes the AI Fiduciary Gap AIFG(D) as the set of deployments with no valid fiduciary principal, the Accountability Vacuum Index AVI = |AIFG(D)| / |D| as its computable measure, and Outcome Attribution Failure OAF(d, tau) as the mechanism perpetuating the gap. The Attribution Horizon result proves that attribution above a chain-length threshold is structurally intractable without pre-deployment instrumentation. The five-component AIFA architecture and four maturity tiers give organizations a path from unchecked fiduciary exposure to board-level accountability reporting.

Arjun Jaggi · Aditya Karnam Gururaj Rao 12 citations Caremark (Del. Ch. 1996) · EU AI Liability Directive · GAO AI Accountability Framework
Read the paper →
AVAL-2026-006  ·  August 2026
The AI Value Accounting Layer: Token-Value Displacement, Consumption Decoupling, and a Formal Architecture for Enterprise AI Financial Accountability
Token-Value Displacement Consumption Decoupling Value Opacity AVAL

Global enterprise AI spend exceeds $2.59 trillion yet fewer than one in three executives can name a specific financial outcome attributable to a specific deployment. This paper formalizes Token-Value Displacement TVD(t) = C(t) − V(t) as the signed divergence between AI consumption and registered value, introduces Value Opacity as the governance failure state where TVD is undefined, and defines Consumption Decoupling as the property binding spend to outcome at authorization time. The four-component AVAL architecture and four-tier maturity model give any organization a computable, auditable path from spend visibility to attestable financial accountability.

Arjun Jaggi · Aditya Karnam Gururaj Rao 12 citations FinOps Foundation · NIST AI RMF · ISO/IEC 42001
Read the paper →
EAIF-2026-005  ·  August 2026
The Enterprise Agent Identity Framework: Authority Bleed, Agent Identity Envelopes, and Delegation Chain Governance for Autonomous AI Agents
Agent Identity Envelope Authority Bleed Authority Bleed Severity Score Delegation Chain Collapse EAIF

Autonomous AI agents execute tasks across enterprise systems using provisioned credentials that persist far beyond any single task scope, creating a novel attack surface no existing identity standard addresses. This paper formalizes the Agent Identity Envelope AIE(a) = (P, Δ, S, T, α) as a five-tuple binding principal, delegation lineage, scope, temporal bound, and attestation; introduces Authority Bleed AB(a,τ) = S(a) \ S_min(a,τ) as the quantifiable excess between provisioned and minimum required permissions; and proves the Delegation Chain Collapse result: any multi-hop delegation chain without per-hop scope re-specification is authorization-equivalent to a direct root-to-terminal grant.

Arjun Jaggi · Aditya Karnam Gururaj Rao 14 citations SPIFFE · OAuth 2.0 · RFC 8693 · NIST AI RMF
Read the paper →
EMGF-2026-004  ·  August 2026
The Enterprise Memory Governance Framework: Memory Drift, Recall Boundaries, and Provenance Chains for Persistent AI Memory at Scale
Memory Drift Recall Boundary Memory Provenance Chain Stale Memory Amplification EMGF

Persistent AI memory without governance creates a silent failure mode: memory diverges from ground truth while appearing to function correctly, and retrieval systems compound rather than correct the divergence above a critical threshold. This paper formalizes Memory Drift D(M,t), Recall Boundary B: A×P×C×T → 2M, and Memory Provenance Chain Π(m), and introduces the Enterprise Memory Governance Framework across five components and four maturity tiers. Observation 1: the Stale Memory Amplification Property.

Arjun Jaggi · Aditya Karnam Gururaj Rao 10 citations GDPR · ISO/IEC 27001:2022 · NIST Privacy Framework
Read the paper →
MATGF-2026-003  ·  August 2026
Multi-Agent Trust Governance: Trust Inheritance, Privilege Cascade, and Agent Trust Chains in Enterprise Orchestration Systems
Trust Inheritance Privilege Cascade Agent Trust Chain Trust Monotonicity Violation MATGF

Multi-agent systems violate least-privilege by default: permissions increase through delegation without explicit scope bounds, creating Privilege Cascade. This paper introduces Trust Inheritance I(D,A,σ) = PD ∩ σ, Privilege Cascade as union-permission amplification, and Agent Trust Chain as a directed acyclic graph with scoped edges. Five MATGF components, four governance tiers, Observation 1: Trust Monotonicity Violation.

Arjun Jaggi · Aditya Karnam Gururaj Rao 10 citations NIST SP 800-207 Zero Trust · RFC 8693
Read the paper →
EAGF-2026-002  ·  August 2026
The Enterprise AI Agent Governance Framework: Action Blast Radius, Delegation Boundaries, and Reversibility Budgets for Agentic AI at Enterprise Scale
Action Blast Radius Agent Delegation Boundary Reversibility Budget EAGF

As autonomous AI agents execute multi-step actions across enterprise systems, governance frameworks designed for single-turn LLM calls are structurally insufficient. This paper introduces Action Blast Radius R(A), Agent Delegation Boundary B: P×C×X → 2Actions, and Reversibility Budget ρ(S). Five EAGF components, four maturity tiers, Observation 1: Agent Reasoning Trace Irreversibility Property.

Arjun Jaggi · Aditya Karnam Gururaj Rao 10 citations NIST AI RMF · ISO/IEC 42001
Read the paper →
EACP-2026-001  ·  August 2026
The Enterprise AI Control Plane: A Governance and Orchestration Framework for LLM Deployments at Scale
Enterprise AI Control Plane Model Routing Engine Cost Governance Engine EACP

Enterprise AI deployments lack the control plane that every prior infrastructure technology required before responsible large-scale operation became possible. This paper introduces the EACP: five components covering model routing, cost governance, audit and observability, access and policy enforcement, and failure and fallback orchestration. Four maturity tiers. Evaluated against NIST AI RMF 1.0 and EU AI Act.

Arjun Jaggi · Aditya Karnam Gururaj Rao 9 citations NIST AI RMF · EU AI Act
Read the paper →